Response to the video

The video brought heavy insight on text messaging while driving perfectly. It was way too late

before they went into collision. It should be advocated and banned permanently. The law

internationally should prohibit it strictly so accidents like that do not occur.

Banning texting while driving.

It coincides with what was read because there are those who feel and know that it is even worse

than using a cellular phone while driving. So therefore safe driving shall always be encouraged.

Banning texting while driving.

To be honest it really and truly should b e banned for one reason only because it is worse than

driving impaired. People who drive impaired have had better responses than those who drive

while texting. Yes it should be banned and the proposal to do it shall follow through.

Cellular Phones While Driving?

• After reading the exmept it is well stated to be a fact.

• The main idea of the passage is to make drivers be aware of not conversing on the phone.

• There reactions were somewhat unusual because the drunken drivers were more aggressive while those drove with the cell phone were worse off because of their slouchy behavior.
• between, while, in addition to, and in contrast to.

• They say that it is not their fault and they are pushing the responsibility on the drivers and are trying to make ways of safe driving without any distractions.

Should Smokers have Rights?

• Well in response and in fact reality. No in favor of the author of the passage smoking should be
  
  very limited. It should only go on outside of a public building, no one wants to smell smoke and
  
  inhale the toxins associated with it. This is why there are laws strictly prohibiting this. The author is right in justifying the complaint about the habits of smoking and its endanger to others.

The main idea is to warn people or make people become aware of the dangers of smoking and how it affects the people around them.

• No Smokers already have rights to purchase these products. So no they no further rights, they can smoke outside if they feel like it. There needs to be no introductary statement for this one.
• The passage at the end 80% of Americans do not smoke outruling the 20 %, therefore the majority has a say. Mr. Sullum in the passage then states that Their next step is to ensure the safety and welfare of children who live around smokers in privately owned vicinities.